The split between the two teams is seen as a way to give the Under-23 team more attention and resources. The Under-23 team has been struggling to compete with the senior team, and the split is seen as a way to level the playing field. The senior team has been prioritizing results and winning matches, but this has come at the expense of developing young players. The Under-23 team has been focusing on developing young players and has been using a more possession-based style of play. The split is seen as a way to give the Under-23 team more autonomy and to allow them to develop their own style of play. However, the split has also raised questions about the future of the Under-23 team and whether they will be able to compete with the senior team.

The situation is being closely watched by fans and pundits alike, and it remains to be seen how the situation will be resolved. The split between the two teams is seen as a way to give the Under-23 team more attention and resources, but it has also raised questions about the future of the Under-23 team and whether they will be able to compete with the senior team.

The Under-23 team has been training separately from the senior team, and the split has caused tension between the two teams. Some fans have expressed concerns that the Under-23 team is being neglected and that the senior team is not doing enough to develop young players. However, others have defended the decision, saying that it is necessary for the senior team to focus on winning matches and that the Under-23 team will benefit from the experience of training with the senior team.

The situation is being closely watched by fans and pundits alike, and it remains to be seen how the situation will be resolved. The split between the two teams is seen as a way to give the Under-23 team more autonomy and to allow them to develop their own style of play.